Once Unfaithful, Always Unfaithful: The Numbers Are Clear

July 13, 2026

It’s a question that haunts many relationships after betrayal: can a second chance really be granted? An in-depth psychological study, conducted on several hundred participants, examined long-term romantic behaviors to test the validity of the famous adage. The results are unequivocal. Individuals who have previously cheated on a partner in the past show a statistically much higher risk of repeating infidelity in their subsequent relationships. This “cycle of infidelity” raises fascinating questions about our biological and psychological fidelity.


What you will learn

  • The precise statistics proving the propensity for recidivism among unfaithful partners.

  • Why the brain gradually adapts to lying and betrayal over time.

  • The surprising role of suspicion: being the victim of infidelity also increases your chances of being cheated on again.


A Threefold Risk of Recidivism

To obtain these results, researchers tracked 484 participants engaged in mixed romantic relationships. The study did not settle for a single moment in time; it analyzed transitions from one relationship to the next.

The numbers are telling: people who admitted to having a side affair in their first relationship were three times more likely to cheat again in the following relationship, compared with those who remained faithful from the start.

This trend suggests that for a portion of the population, infidelity is not an isolated misstep caused by a “toxic” partner, but rather a behavioral pattern that moves from couple to couple.

The Neurological Loop: When the Brain Becomes Habituated to Deceit

Why is it so hard to break this cycle? Part of the answer lies in the amygdala, the brain region that manages our emotions, notably guilt.

During an initial act of infidelity, the amygdala lights up intensely, triggering a sense of discomfort or shame. Yet, earlier research cited by the study indicates that the brain undergoes an adaptation process. As lies are repeated, the amygdala’s response dampens.

The emotional weight of betrayal diminishes, making it technically and psychologically easier to move to the next act. The brain literally learns to ignore the moral alarm signal from conscience.

The Victim’s Trauma: A Permanent Radar for Suspicion

The study reveals another darker and unexpected aspect: the impact on those who were betrayed. People whose first partner was unfaithful have twice as likely to experience the same betrayal with the next partner.

This phenomenon does not mean the victim is at fault, but highlights a complex psychological dynamic. On one hand, some individuals may unconsciously be drawn to the same “type” of unfaithful partner.

On the other hand, the suspicion arising from the first betrayal can poison the subsequent relationship. By persistently suspecting infidelity (sometimes wrongly), the tension created can paradoxically hasten the breakup or drive the new partner to seek affection elsewhere.

Is There Still Hope for the Couple?

Despite these discouraging statistics, the researchers stress that nuance is essential. If the risk is three times higher, it does not reach 100%. Chronic infidelity depends on many factors, ranging from personality to emotional attachment.

Science suggests, however, that transparency and deep psychological work on the causes of the initial act are indispensable to breaking this biological pattern. Without this awareness, the adage “once unfaithful, always unfaithful” remains a prediction with formidable accuracy for the survival of modern couples.

Sindre Halvorsen

I write about space exploration, frontier science and the technologies that are quietly shaping the future. From Norway, I follow the missions, discoveries and ideas that connect life on Earth with what lies beyond it. My goal is to make complex subjects clear, useful and worth paying attention to.